spinofflive
Abstract illustration of hands holding prison bars, on blue background.
Abstract illustration of hands holding prison bars, on blue background.

OPINIONSocietyDecember 12, 2020

Freedom from torture is a non-negotiable human right

Abstract illustration of hands holding prison bars, on blue background.
Abstract illustration of hands holding prison bars, on blue background.

The UN’s ‘Nelson Mandela rules’ state that you can take away someone’s liberty, but not their humanity. New Zealand’s punitive abuse of Māori and Pacific peoples in prison is trampling all over that, writes Meg de Ronde, executive director of Amnesty International New Zealand.

There’s an oft-used quote attributed to Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela: “It is said that no one truly knows a nation until one has been inside its jails. A nation should not be judged by how it treats its highest citizens, but its lowest ones.”

It’s no coincidence that the United Nations “standard minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners”, which have their roots in the first UN Congress on “the prevention of crime and the treatment of offenders” in 1955, are now officially known as “the Nelson Mandela rules”. Recognised by nations around the world as minimum standards in places of detention, the revised name seeks to honour the legacy of the late president of South Africa, Nelson Mandela, who spent 27 years in prison in the course of his struggle for global human rights, equality, democracy and the promotion of a culture of peace.

The international law, standards and norms that underpin the human rights framework for criminal justice essentially boil down to this: when the state detains a person, it takes away their liberty, but it cannot deny a person their humanity. There is an inherent power imbalance that can be abused when we take people’s liberty away and confine them in a locked room.

It’s not often that international law says there are absolutely zero, nada, situations in which a human right can be legitimately limited or restricted, even in times of public emergency that threaten the life of the nation. But freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment is one of them. It’s non-negotiable. Against this backdrop, in Aotearoa New Zealand, and of no surprise to tangata whenua, it is profoundly clear that in many of our places of detention we are denying people their dignity. In Aotearoa we overwhelmingly tend to lock up those who have already been abused, are unwell or are from communities that have already experienced the full and at times fatal force of the state through colonisation and its ongoing impacts.

Just last week, Māori Party leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer in her maiden speech to parliament told the history of her tīpuna, who were among the two groups of Māori men from Taranaki sent down to Dunedin gaol as prisoners in 1869 and 1879 for fighting in the land wars and for peaceful resistance at Parihaka. Many of the men, including Ngarewa-Packer’s great grandfather, were boys, elderly, or in poor health. Many would die, mostly of bronchitis and tuberculosis, exacerbated by the damp prison conditions and sleeping arrangements.

The same week of Ngarewa-Packer’s recounting of the colonised history of our jails, the faces of Mihi Bassett and Karma Cripps burst into our collective consciousness. Guyon Espiner revealed on RNZ what we at Amnesty International Aotearoa New Zealand had been concerned about for some time. The humane and fair treatment promised in our Corrections Act, which is meant to be based on international standards such as the Mandela rules, was far from the reality.

The reporting revealed a litany of dehumanising practices and punitive culture at Auckland Region Women’s Correctional Facility (ARWCF). The story detailed “cell-buster extraction”; where several cans of pepper spray are pumped into a confined cell, including on Cripps who had asthma, to incapacitate them for removal; long periods of segregation at “the pound”; women having to put their face to the ground before they were fed, and poor sanitation.

Then, on Human Rights Day on December 10, the updated report on seclusion and restraint in places of detention from the Human Rights Commission landed with a thud. Dr Sharon Shalev’s findings confirmed all our worst fears, that the unjust practices of seclusion, restraint and force used at Auckland Women’s prison were systemic across our detention system, in Corrections, in Oranga Tamariki residences, and in mental health units.

Mihi and Karma are some of the faces of the Māori women who make up 78% of detainees in the most controlled segregation areas, called “management units”. In “separates units” (used for punishment) Māori women made up 65% of all stays. Their experience of pepper spray cell-busting was echoed by other prisoners who described having to resort to putting their head down the toilet in order to get air when a neighbouring cell was gassed. The report author politely but incisively points to data provided by Corrections themselves, which suggests that rather than replacing physical force (as was intended), pepper spray was used alongside other forms of restraint.

The long list of issues described in the report include segregation that could amount to prolonged solitary confinement, potential racial and gender bias,  little human contact, “austere” material conditions, lack of privacy and personal autonomy and insufficient staff training. These findings are not only a denial of the bare minimum standards promised by those in power, but a denial of the humanity to which we must hold tight.

The seriousness, depth and extent of issues raised is why we are calling on the minister of corrections, Hon Kelvin Davis, to take both immediate action to end specific dehumanising practices, and to launch an inquiry into the state of our prison system. It is the minister who has overall responsibility and the opportunity to make positive, transformative, systemic change. Our nation’s jails have been found wanting, and now is the time to confront who we are and who we want to be.

Keep going!
(Getty Images)
(Getty Images)

SocietyDecember 12, 2020

All dressed up and nowhere to go: Otago graduands on the cancellation of capping

(Getty Images)
(Getty Images)

Thousands of former students and their families have now been affected by the last-minute postponement of Otago University and Polytechnic graduation ceremonies due to a security threat earlier this week. Among those set to graduate, the news was met with disappointment and disbelief, reports Sinead Gill – and a little relief.

For an event that has caused such upheaval for thousands of Otago graduands and their families, remarkably little is publicly known about the threat to this week’s graduation ceremonies. While the police have only stated that a threat was made against a University of Otago graduation ceremony, a news story reported that the threat made reference to a shooting and was received on Tuesday, the day the royal commission inquiry into the Christchurch mosque shootings was made public. So far, five Otago University and Otago Polytechnic graduation ceremonies have been postponed, with no arrests made.

Otago University Vice-Chancellor Professor Harlene Hayne speaks to media outside the Dunedin Police Station on December 09, 2020 about the postponement of graduation ceremonies following a security threat. (Photo: Joe Allison/Getty Images)

Laura Anderson and Tessa Robinson both completed a Master of Politics at the beginning of 2020. After the May and August graduations were cancelled due to Covid-19, they thought that this month’s ceremonies would finally close the university chapter of their lives. On Wednesday, they joined the early crowd outside near Otago Dental School, from where the capping procession would march under the unusually blistering Dunedin sun. Just minutes before the procession was due to begin, they heard a shout from someone nearby: both the 1pm and 4pm ceremonies had been cancelled.

“I thought it was a prank or something,” says Anderson, “because my heels were destroying my feet and it’d be so funny to pretend I wasn’t going to have to walk down to the town hall.” It was only when she and Robinson checked the University of Otago’s Facebook page that they realised the announcement was real. “We honestly just had a bit of a laugh,” says Anderson, “because of course something else had happened to an already postponed graduation.”

The general response from the crowd of cloaked graduands, they say, wasn’t fear of the threat, but hesitation and confusion about what to do next. Slowly, phones were pulled out to call loved ones. Robinson rang her parents who were driving into town from the airport. “I felt bad because Mum is super busy at the moment and had just come down for the day.”

“Everyone was in a state of disbelief, really,” says Anderson. “A lot of confused faces, people hearing different tidbits of what was going on and if it was postponed or cancelled, and what that would mean for the immediate ceremonies.”

At the same time, Vivian Griffiths, who was due to graduate with a Bachelor of Laws, was still at a pre-graduation morning tea on campus. He noticed a senior university employee had come to the front of the room to announce something over the PA system. With only a few minutes until the procession was due to begin, Griffiths assumed it was an attempt to get them out the door. He turned to chat to a mate, “then I heard the words ‘postponed’, and thought ‘hang on a second’. At this point it was clear something was up.”

There was about “30 seconds of panic” while people tried to figure out what had been said. “Then all of a sudden the big TV in the business school started flashing orange saying the words ‘graduation postponed’.” As the news sunk in, the absurdity of the situation became clear to the many people in the room, he included, who had already had their graduations postponed twice this year. The third time’s the charm.

Then, almost immediately, “Messenger Chat messages started flying and within 15 minutes a fake graduation was planned,” Griffiths says. It seemed everyone was trying to come up with replacement celebrations. “My old hall Selwyn invited all of the graduates for a picnic and afternoon tea because they felt bad about the graduation, which was very lovely and wholesome.”

Computer science graduand Andy Randell (they/them/their) wasn’t quite as unlucky as Griffiths – this is their first postponed graduation – but was still “very disappointed” not to be capped this week. The first question Randell asked when a friend rang them with the news was “is it serious?”. Randell was an Otago University student in 2015 when a shooting threat against the university was made on the website 4Chan, which eventually was traced back to a user in South America. As in 2015, Randell suspects that this new perpetrator’s true intention is to just “be a nuisance”.

Randell is sad to have missed out on the ceremony, but not as sad as their mum. “My older sister graduated from varsity in absentia, so I was essentially the first child in my family to have a graduation. My mum is really disappointed.”

For many of the graduands The Spinoff spoke to, the hardest part has been the impact on their families. Griffiths says the postponement “visibly upset” his whānau, who had travelled to Dunedin for the ceremony. It was particularly tough on his grandparents. “My parents and grandparents were quite upset by the whole ordeal. My grandparents (84 and 86) both travelled from Queenstown for the celebration, which is a big trip for them to make nowadays.”

Robinson was worried that her parents might be upset too, but they were more concerned with how their daughter felt. “Ultimately [they were] just happy to make it and then we got to all spend more time together anyway. I think for the parents just seeing you in the gown and cap is a big deal.”

Instead of sitting through hours of ceremony, Anderson was happy to enjoy the “sweet relief of flat shoes” and a couple of Pinots with friends and whānau. “It was actually a lovely day in Dunedin,” says Robinson, “so it was much better to be outside having a drink instead of inside a hall for a couple of hours.”.

In the cancellation’s immediate aftermath, many graduands expressed their relief at not having to sit through the notoriously long university capping ceremony. For Anderson, Tuesday’s Māori pre-graduation event felt like the real ceremony, anyway. “It was full of manaakitanga and love and celebration, in a way that I didn’t see when I watched a friend graduate in the university ceremony. It felt like far more of a unique and meaningful reflection and recognition of our efforts.”

A replacement ceremony in 2021 has been promised, but of the graduands The Spinoff spoke to, only Randell plans to attend. Both Robinson and Griffiths are happy with their photos; Griffiths and Anderson say their Māori pre-graduation brought them the closure they needed. For some, though, the stress isn’t over. More graduation ceremonies are scheduled for next Wednesday and Saturday, and there’s widespread uncertainty about whether they’ll go ahead. With just days to go, one student told The Spinoff she didn’t know whether to tell her parents to cancel their flights, or wait and hope for the best.

There is no doubt in these graduands’ minds that cancellation was the best call. As Griffiths points out, students would likely have been far angrier if they’d completed the ceremony only to be told afterwards that their lives had been at risk. Robinson, who ended the day having wines in the sun, is even more philosophical about how it all turned out.

“Just going back to Dunedin, putting on the robe and taking the photos felt like the main part of the graduation anyway.”

Sinead Gill is the 2020 editor of Critic Te Arohi, the University of Otago student magazine.